Here's the deal in three easy steps:So: even if you're the worrying sort, the pessimistic scenario suggests that we'll need to do no more than gradually increase taxes by about one-tenth starting in a couple of decades. Or perhaps by a twentieth along with a few modest benefit reductions. Not exactly the end of the world. But the most likely scenario is that Social Security is in fine shape and we don't have to do anything at all.
Currently, federal government spending amounts to about 20% of GDP.
Every year, the Social Security trustees make three projections for the future growth of benefits. The middle projection indicates that everything is fine until about 2042, after which we will need to increase taxes by — wait for it — a whopping 2% of GDP.
However, it turns out that the middle projection hasn't turned out to be the most accurate in the past. The "low cost" projection has. And that projection tells us that Social Security is solvent for at least the next 80 years.
Thoughts, anecdotes, amusing stories, and all sorts of interesting things, brought to you by Paige (that’s me). Void where prohibited. Warning: Sometimes I display an unhealthy obsession watching USA Softball’s Cat Osterman. Check out my photos on Flickr.
Sunday, March 19, 2006
No Doom And Gloom for Social Security
Kevin Drum summarizes the latest projections regarding Social Security:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment